Thinking About ‘Completed Life’ Euthanasia in the Netherlands from the Generative Perspective: A Reflexive Exploration

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/aa.2021.286

Keywords:

completed life euthanasia, generativity, loss of meaning, burden, the Netherlands

Abstract

In this reflective essay, we explore the concept of generativity and propose it as a more positive interpretation of the experience of ‘completed life’ and its bearing on the wish to die. In 2010, more than 100,000 people in the Netherlands signed a petition requesting an extension of the existing euthanasia legislation. They asked the government to grant euthanasia to older persons who feel tired of life and who regard their lives as complete, in the absence of physical or psychic sickness. Debates about ‘completed life’ euthanasia have continued since then, but the various factions in these debates have been unable to reach consensus or conclusion. In this paper, we analyse the concept of generativity and use this to interpret statements by supporters of ‘completed life’ euthanasia. Next, we disentangle common idioms that people use when they grow older and feel that death is approaching yet still out of reach. The aim of this article is to invite readers to reflect on the wish for ‘completed life’ euthanasia as a meaningful end-of-life reaction.

Author Biography

Sjaak van der Geest, Cultural Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Emeritus Professor Medical Amsterdam

References

Ambrose, Don. 2009. “Aspiration development and self-fulfillment.” In Encyclopedia of Giftedness, Creativity, and Talent, edited by B. Kerr, 63-65. Los Angeles: Sage.

Author. 2002.

Author and Author. 2019.

Baars, Jan. 2017. “Aging: Learning to live a finite life.” The Gerontologist 57, 969–976. doi:10.1093/geront/gnw089.

CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) 2019. Opvattingen over Euthanasie [Opinions about Euthanasia]. https://www.cbs.nl/nl-nl/achtergrond/2019/47/opvattingen-over-euthanasie . (accessed January 29, 2020).

CIP (Christelijk Informatie Platform). 2019. “Christelijke coalitiepartners D66 reageren verbolgen op plan voltooid leven” [Christian coalition partners react angry to D66’s plan completed life]. https://cip.nl/75238-christelijke-coalitiepartners-d66-reageren-verbolgen-op-plan-voltooid-leven (accessed 30-4-2020).

Dawkins, Richard. 1976. The Selfish Gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

De Jong, Antina and Gert van Dijk. 2017. “Euthanasia in the Netherlands: Balancing autonomy and compassion.” World Medical Journal 63, 10-15.

Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice. 2002. “Termination of life on request and assisted suicide (Review Procedures) Act.” Den Haag: Dutch Ministry of Security and Justice, Available at: http://wetten.overheid.nl/BWBR0012410/2014-02-15/0/informatie (accessed March 29, 2020).

Erikson, Erik H. 1997 [1982]. The Life Cycle Completed (extended edition). New York / London: Norton.

Foner, Nancy. 1993. “When the contract fails: Care for the elderly in nonindustrial cultures.” In The Changing Contract across Generations, edited by V. L. Bengston, and W. A. Achenbaum, 101-117. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

Fortuin, Nienke P.M., Johannes B.A.M. Schilderman, and Eric Venbrux. 2019. “Interpretation and timing of death: The development and initial validation of the interpretation of death (IOD) scale and the attitudes toward medical interventions in the timing of death (AMITOD) scale.” Death Studies, DOI: 10.1080/07481187.2019.1626950.

Gee, Ellen, Margaret Thomas, and Gloria M. Gutman. 2000. The Overselling of Population Aging: Apocalyptic Demography, Intergenerational Challenges, and Social Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.

Kotre, John. 1984. Outliving the Self: Generativity and the Interpretation of Lives. Boston: Johns Hopkins University Press.

Peters, Jit, et al. 2011. Uit Vrije Wil. Waardig Sterven op Hoge Leeftijd [Of Free Will: Dying with Dignity at Old Age]. Amsterdam: Boom.

Rand, David G., Joshua D. Greene, and Martin A. Nowak. 2012. “Spontaneous giving and calculated greed.” Nature 489 (7416), 427.

Richards, Naomi. 2017. “Old age rational suicide.” Sociology Compass, 11: e12456. https://doi.org/10.1111/soc4.12456

Rubinstein, Robert L., et al. 2015. “Extending the framework of generativity theory through research: A qualitative study.” The Gerontologist 55, 548–559.

Salazar, Carola. 2017. Social contract on elderly caregiving in contemporary Chile: Perspectives of a group of social scientists. Anthropology & Aging 38, 1, 60-79. https://DOI 10.5195/aa.2017.134.

Schnabel, Paul., et al. 2016. Voltooid Leven: Over Hulp bij Zelfdoding aan Mensen die hun Leven Voltooid Achten. [Completed life: On assisted suicide to people who consider their lives complete]. Den Haag: Adviescommissie Voltooid Leven. https://dspace.library.uu.nl/handle/1874/346308.

Schwartz, Carolyn E., et al. 2004. “Exploring response shift in longitudinal data.” Psychology & Health 19(1): 51–69.

Van Wijngaarden, Els J., Carlo J.W. Leget, and Anne Goossensen. 2015. “Ready to give up on life: The lived experience of elderly people who feel life is completed and no longer worth living.” Social Science & Medicine 138, 257-264.

Van Wijngaarden, Els J., Carlo J.W. Leget, and Anne Goossensen. “Till death do us part: The lived experience of an elderly couple who chose to end their lives by spousal self-euthanasia.” The Gerontologist 56, 1062–1071

Van Wijngaarden, Els J., et al. 2019. “A captive, a wreck, a piece of dirt: Aging anxieties embodied in older people with a death wish.” OMEGA—Journal of Death and Dying 80, 245–265.

Van Wijngaarden, Els J., et al. 2020. Perspectieven op de Doodswens bij Voltooid Leven: De Mens en de Cijfers [Perspectives on death wish in case of completed life: The people and the numbers]. The Hague: ZonMw.

Villar, Feliciano. 2002. “Successful ageing and development: The contribution of generativity in older age.” Ageing & Society 32, 1087-1105.

Downloads

Published

2021-05-11

Issue

Vol. 42 No. 1 (2021)

Section

Commentaries

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.