Going Beyond the Dwelling Challenging the Meaning of Home at the End of Life

Authors

  • Renske C. Visser University of Surrey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/aa.2019.215

Abstract

-

References

Andrews, G.J., Evans, J. & Wiles, J.L., 2013. Re-spacing and re-placing gerontology: Relationality and affect. Ageing and Society, 33(8), pp.1339–1373.

Blunt, A. & Dowling, R., 2006. Home, London and New York: Routledge.

Borgstrom, E., 2016. National End-of-Life Care Policy in the English Context: The Problem and Solution to Death and Dying. In L. Foster & K. Woodthorpe, eds. Death and Social Policy in Challenging Times. Houndmills, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 35–53.

Borgstrom, E. & Walter, T., 2015. Choice and compassion at the end of life: A critical analysis of recent English policy discourse. Social Science and Medicine, 136–137(2015), pp.99–105.

Bowlby, S., Gregory, S. & McKie, L., 1997. “Doing home”: Patriarchy, caring, and space. Women’s Studies International Forum, 20(3), pp.343–350.

Burrell, K., 2014. Spilling over from the Street. Contextualizing Domestic Space in an Inner-City Neighborhood. Home Cultures, 11(2), pp.145–166.

Collier, A., Phillips, J.L. & Iedema, R., 2015. The meaning of home at the end of life : A video-reflexive ethnography study. Palliative medicine, 29(8), pp.695–702.

Department of Health, 2012. End of Life Care Strategy. Fourth Annual Report., London.

Department of Health, 2008. End of Life Care Strategy. Promoting high quality care for all adults at the end of life, London.

Department of Health, 2017. One Year On: The Government Response to the Review of Choice in End of Life Care, London.

Duyvendak, J.W., 2011. The Politics of Home. Belonging and Nostalgia in Western Europe and the United States, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Easthope, H., 2004. A place called home. Housing, Theory and Society, 21(3), pp.128–138.

Gomes, B. et al., 2013. Heterogeneity and changes in preferences for dying at home: a systematic review. BMC palliative care, 12(7).

Hauge, S. & Kristin, H., 2008. The nursing home as a home: A field study of residents’ daily life in the common living rooms. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 17(4), pp.460–467.

Higginson, I.J. et al., 2013. Dying at home – is it better: A narrative appraisal of the state of the science. Palliative Medicine, 27(10), pp.918–924.

Hoare, S. et al., 2015. Do patients want to die at home? A systematic review of the UK literature, focused on missing preferences for place of death. PLoS ONE, 10(11), pp.1–17.

Jackson, M., 1995. At home in the world, Durham and London: Duke University Press.

Jacobsen, M.H., 2017. ‘The Bad Death’: Deciphering and Developing the Dominant Discourse on ‘The Good Death.’ In V. Parvaresh & A. Capone, eds. The Pragmeme of Accommodation: The Case of Interaction around the Event of Death. New York: Springer, pp. 351–373.

Kaufman, S., 2005. ...And a time to die. How American Hospitals Shape the end of life, New York: Scribner.

Kellehear, A., Pugh, E. & Atter, L., 2009. Home away from home? A case study of bedside objects in a hospice. International journal of palliative nursing, 15(3), pp.148–52.

Mallett, S., 2004. Understanding home: a critical review of the literature. The Sociological Review, 52(1), pp.62–89.

Means, R., 2007. Safe as Houses? Ageing in Place and Vulnerable Older People in the UK. Social Policy & Administration, 41(1), pp.65–85.

Peace, S., 2015. Meanings of home in later life. In J. Twigg & W. Martin, eds. Routledge Handbook of Cultural Gerontology. London: Routledge, pp. 447–454.

Penney, L., 2013. The Uncertain Bodies and Spaces of Aging in Place. Anthropology & Aging Quaterly, 34(3), pp.113–125.

Pollock, K., 2015. Is home always the best and preferred place of death? Bmj, 351(October), pp.31–33.

Public Health England, 2014. What we know now 2014, London.

Solé-Auró, A. & Crimmins, E.M., 2014. Who cares? A comparison of informal and formal care provision in Spain, England and the USA. Ageing and society, 34(3), pp.495–517.

Venkatasalu, M.R., Seymour, J.E. & Arthur, A., 2014. Dying at home: A qualitative study of the perspectives of older South Asians living in the United Kingdom. Palliative Medicine, 28(3), pp.264–272.

Visser, R.C., 2017. “Doing Death”: Reflecting on the Researcher’s Subjectivity and Emotions. Death Studies, 41(1), pp.6–13.

Wye, L., Percival, J. & Purdy, S., 2012. Independent Evaluation of the Marie Curie Cancer Care Delivering Choice Programme in Somerset and North Somerset Final report October 2012 University of Bristol Evaluation Project Team, (October).

Downloads

Published

2019-02-08

Issue

Vol. 40 No. 1 (2019)

Section

Commentaries

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.