Conceptual Frameworks and Practical Applications to Connect Generations in the Technoscape

Authors

  • Matthew Kaplan The Pennsylvania State University
  • Mariano Sánchez University of Granada (Spain)
  • Leah Bradley Heyman Interages Center, Jewish Council for the Aging

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/aa.2015.99

Keywords:

aging, technology, intergenerational programs, intergenerational relationships, intergenerational communication

Abstract

There are many ways to frame and use technology so it functions as a pathway to intergenerational engagement.  The ever evolving technoscape is filled with powerful technological tools and resources that help people connect, communicate, build relationships, and take collective action across generations.  This technology can be life-altering, especially for isolated seniors and families navigating long distance relationships.  However, at the center of the intervention equation is not the technology itself, but the quest for tapping into the relationship-enhancing potential of the technology. To explore this potential, an international survey was conducted with 46 intergenerational programs that reflect innovation and intensive uses of technology. Results demonstrate that important strides are being made in utilizing new technology for effectively connecting generations and positively affecting aging adults’ lives.

Author Biographies

Matthew Kaplan, The Pennsylvania State University

Professor of Intergenerational Programs and Aging - in the Department of Agricultural Economics, Sociology, and Education, The Pennsylvania State University, USA

Mariano Sánchez, University of Granada (Spain)

Associate Professor, Sociology Department
University of Granada (Spain)

Leah Bradley, Heyman Interages Center, Jewish Council for the Aging

Assistant Director, Heyman Interages Center, Jewish Council for the Aging, in Rockville, MD (USA) 

References

AARP. Connecting Generations. [A report of selected findings from a survey and focus groups conducted by Microsoft and AARP.] February. Washington, D.C.: AARP. 2012. Accessed June 25, 2015. http://assets.aarp.org/rgcenter/general/Connecting-Generations.pdf.

Armstrong, Natasha “Historypin: Bringing Generations Together Around a Communal History of Time and Place.” Journal of Intergenerational Relationships10, no.3 (2012): 294-298. doi: 10.1080/15350770.2012.697412

Author. 2015.

Gregorio Convertino, Umer Farooq, and Mary B. Rosson, “The Firekeepers: Aging Considered As a Resource,” Universal Access in the Information Society 11 [2011]: 7-15. doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0229-9.

CLD Standards for Scotland. Mapping the Future: An Intergenerational Project. Community Learning Development, Standards Council for Scotland. N.D. Accessed June 25, 2015. http://www.cldstandardscouncil.org.uk/files/Mapping_the_Future.pdf.

Stephanie Clifford. “Online, a reason to keep going.” New York Times, June/July 2, 2009, D5.

Mats Eriksson, Veli-Pekka Niitamo, and Seija Kulki. State-of-the-art in Utilizing Living Labs Approach to User-centric ICT Innovation – a European Approach, Centre for Distance-spanning Technology at Luleå University of Technology. 2005. Accessed June 25, 2015. http://www.vinnova.se/upload/dokument/Verksamhet/TITA/Stateoftheart_LivingLabs_Eriksson2005.pdf. .

Helen R. Feist, Kelly Parker, and Graeme Hugo (2012). “Older and Online: Enhancing Social Connections in Australian Rural Places,” The Journal of Community Informatics, 8 (1) [2012]. Accessed June 25, 2015. http://www.ci-journal.net/index.php/ciej/article/view/818.

Cristina Figuer Ramirez, Sara Malo Cerrato, and Irma Bertran Camats. Cambios en las relaciones y satisfacciones intergeneracionales asociados al uso de las TICs. [Intergenerational relations, changes, and satisfaction associated with ICT use] Intervención Psicosocial, 19 (1) [2010]: 27-39. doi: 10.5093/in2010v19n1a4.

Dave Harley and Geraldine Fitzpatrick, “Creating a Conversational Context Through Video Blogging: A Case Study of Geriatric 127,” Computers in Human Behavior 25 [2009]: 679-689. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.08.011.

Dave Harley, Frank Vetere, Geraldine Fitzpatrick, and Sri Kurniawan, “Intergenerational Context As an Emphasis for Design.” Universal Access in the Information Society 11 [2012]: 1-5. doi:10.1007/s10209-011-0228-x.

Nancy Henkin, Coritta Brown, and Sally Liederman, . Intergenerational Community Building: Lessons Learned. Philadelphia, PA: The Intergenerational Center, Temple University. 2012. Accessed June 25, 2015. http://communitiesforallages.org/sites/default/files/lessonslearnedcfaa2.pdf.

Annabel D. Knight. “Funding Intergenerational Initiatives to Strengthen Local Communities,” Quality in Ageing and Older Adults, 13 (4) [2012]: 307-316.

Abigail R. Lawrence-Jacobson and MatthewKaplan “The Applicability of Empowerment Theory to Intergenerational Programming,” Japan Journal of Intergenerational Studies 1 (1) [2011]: 7-17.

Gustavo S. Mesch "Family Characteristics and Intergenerational Conflicts over the Internet." Information, Communication & Society 9 (4) [2006]: 473-495. doi:10.1080/13691180600858705.

Ralph Schneider, Luca Tosolini, Miahi Iacob, and Gilberto Collinassi, Grandparents and Grandchildren: Handbook for Tutors. 2012. Accessed June 25, 2015, http://www.geengee.eu/geengee/geengee-docs/contenuti/comune/MANUALS/Handbook_for_TUTORS_FINAL_version3.8.pdf.

Neil Selwyn, Stephen Gorard, John Furlong, and Louise Madden, “Older Adults' Use of Information and Communications Technology in Everyday Life.” Ageing & Society 23 [2003]: 561-582. doi:10.1017/S0144686X03001302..

Anna Tarrant, “(Grand)paternal Care Practices and Affective Intergenerational Encounters using Information Communication Technologies,” in Intergenerational Spaces 2015, edited by Robert Vanderbeck and Nancy Worth, 286-299. London, UK: Routledge, 2015.

Third, Amanda, Richardson, Ingrid, Collin, Phillipa, Rahilly, Kitty & Bolzan, Natalie. Intergenerational Attitudes Towards Social Networking and Cybersafety: A Living Lab. Melbourne: Cooperative Research Centre for Young People, Technology and Wellbeing. 2011.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-19

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.