Narrating Future Selves: Perspectives on Ageing from a Scottish Cohort Born in 1936

Authors

  • Jane Elliott University of Exeter
  • JD Carpentieri University College London

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/aa.2020.245

Keywords:

Scotland, cohort, narrative, future, generativity, planning

Abstract

In this paper we investigate the perspectives individuals take on their future at a particular chronological age, the late 70s.  We seek to provide insights into the diverse ways that older people incorporate narratives about possible future selves into their decision making and planning for the future, and how this supports wellbeing. This paper is based on detailed analysis of qualitative biographical interviews conducted with 33 men and women who were all born in Scotland in 1936.These individuals were chosen because they formed part of a longitudinal cohort study called the ‘6-day sample study’ that was initiated in Scotland in 1947. The material we draw on enables us to examine individuals’ biographical narratives as recounted in a research interview alongside insights into individual capacities and wellbeing derived from more structured quantitative questionnaires. We are interested in the presentation of the ageing self in an ethnographic interview, and how these presentations may complement or conflict with insights from the structured quantitative data collected in the study.

Author Biography

Jane Elliott, University of Exeter

Professor of Sociology

Department of Sociology, Philosophy and Anthropology

References

Andrews, M. (2009). The narrative complexity of successful ageing. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 29(1/2), 73–83. http://doi.org/10.1108/01443330910934736

Bohlmeijer, E.T., Westerhof G.J., Randall,W., Tromp,T. Kenyon G. (2011) Narrative foreclosure in later life: Preliminary considerations for a new sensitizing concept

Journal of Aging Studies, Volume 25, Issue 4, Pages 364-370

Brett, C., & Deary, I. (2014). The long road to realising data linkage: obtaining permission for the 6-Day Sample study. Longitudinal and Life Course Studies, 5, 283-298.

http://dx.doi.org/10.14301/llcs.v5i3.266

Bruner, J. (1987). ‘Life as Narrative’, Social Research 54, pp. 11–32.

Carrese, JA., Mullaney J.L. Faden R.R., Finucane, T.E., (2002) Planning for death but not serious future illness: qualitative study of housebound elderly patients. BMJ v 325 July 2002. p1-5.

Carpentieri, J. & Elliott, J. (2014). ‘Understanding healthy aging using a qualitative approach: the value of narratives and individual biographies’. In D. Kuh, R. Cooper, R. Hardy, M. Richards, & Y. Ben-Shlomo (Eds.), Oxford University Press.

Carpentieri, J., Elliott, J., Brett, C., & Deary, I. (2016). ‘Adding narratives to numbers in a mixed methods study of successful aging: the 6-Day Sample of the Scottish Mental Survey 1947’. Sociological Research Online, 21(2), 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.3926

Carpentieri, J., Elliott, J., Brett, C., & Deary, I. (2016). ‘Adapting to ageing: A mixed methods study of the role of Selection, Optimisation and Compensation in the maintenance of high wellbeing’ Journals of Gerontology, Series B.

Chase, S. (1995). Taking Narrative Seriously: Consequences for Method and Theory in Interview Studies. In R. Josselson & A. Lieblich (Eds.) Interpreting Experience: The Narrative Study of Lives, vol. 3. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Deary, I.J., Whalley, L.J. and Starr, J.M. (2009). A Lifetime of Intelligence: Follow-up Studies of the Scottish Mental Surveys of 1932 and 1947. American Psychological Association, Washington, DC.

Deary, I., & Brett, C. (2015). Predicting and retrodicting intelligence between childhood and old age in the 6-Day Sample of the Scottish Mental Survey 1947. Intelligence, 50, 1-9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.02.002

Depp, C.A. and Jeste, D.V. (2006). ‘Definitions and predictors of successful aging: a comprehensive review of larger quantitative studies’, American Journal of Geriatric Psych 14, 6–20.

Erikson, E. H. 1963. Childhood and Society. Norton, New York.

Erikson, E. H. 1982. The Life Cycle Completed. Norton, New York.

Facchini, C. and Rampazi, M., 2009. ‘No longer young, not yet old: Biographical uncertainty in late-adult temporality’. Time & Society, 18(2-3), pp.351-372.

Fontana, A., & Frey, J. H. (2005). The Interview: From Neutral Stance to Political Involvement. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (pp. 695-727). Thousand Oaks, CA, : Sage Publications Ltd.

Freeman, M. (2000). When the story's over, narrative foreclosure and the possibility of self-renewal. Lines of narrative.

Gubrium, J. F. and Holstein, J. A. (1997). The new language of qualitative method. Oxford University Press on Demand.

Higgs, P. and Gilleard, C., 2014. Frailty, abjection and the ‘othering’ of the fourth age. Health Sociology Review, 23(1), pp.10-19.

Hollway, W., & Jefferson, T. (2000). Doing Qualitative Research Differently: free association, narrative and the interview method. London: Sage.

Kahana, E., Kahana, B., & Lee, J. E. (2014). Proactive Approaches to Successful Aging: One Clear Path through the Forest. Gerontology, 60(5), 466–74.

Kenyon, G. M., Clark, P. G., & Vries, B. D. (2001). Narrative Gerontology: Theory, Research, and Practice. Springer Publishing Co Inc.

Kotre, J. (1995) “Generative outcome”. Journal of Ageing Studies 9, 1 p33-41.

Laidlaw, K., Power, M.J., Schmidt, S. and the WHOQOL-OLD Group. (2007). ‘Attitudes to ageing questionnaire (AAQ): development and psychometric properties’, International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry 22, 367–379. doi:10.1002/gps.1683

Markus, H., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954-969

Morson, G.S. (1994) Narrative and Freedom: The Shadows of Time (Yale University Press)

Laslett, P. (1989). Fresh Map of Life: The Emergence of the Third Age. Harvard University Press.

Neale, B. (2019) ‘What is Qualitative Longitudinal Research?’ Bloomsbury Academic: London.

Phoenix, C., & Sparkes, A. C. (2009). Being Fred: Big stories, small stories and the accomplishment of a positive ageing identity. Qualitative Research, 9, 219-236.

Ricoeur, P. (1991). Life in quest of narrative. In D. Wood (ed.) On Paul Ricoeur: narrative and interpretation, 20-33. Psychology Press.

Riessman, C. K. (1993). Narrative Analysis. SAGE.

Tennant, R., Hiller, L., Fishwick, R., Platt, S., Joseph, S., Weich, S., & Stewart-Brown, S. (2007). The Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS): development and UK validation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 5(1), 63.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7525-5-63

Strawson, G (2004) ‘Against Narrativity’ Ratio 17 p 428-452.

Traphagan, J.W. (1998) Contesting the Transition to Old Age in Japan Ethnology, Vol. 37, No. 4 (Autumn, 1998), pp. 333-350

Thompson, P, Itzin, C. Abendstern, M (1990) . ‘I don’t feel old: Experience of later life’ Oxford University Press: Oxford.

Villar, F. (2012). 'Successful ageing and development: the contribution of generativity in older age', Ageing & Society, 32(07), p. 1087-1105.

Ware, J., & Sherbourne, C. (1992). The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection. Medical Care, 30(6), 473–483.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002

Downloads

Published

2020-12-14

Issue

Vol. 41 No. 2 (2020)

Section

Special Issue Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.