Age-Inscriptions and Social Change

Authors

  • Cati Coe Rutgers University
  • Erdmute Alber Bayreuth University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/aa.2018.172

Keywords:

aging, life course, migration, age-inscription, institutionalization, social change

Abstract

This special issue introduces the concept of age-inscription. It accounts for the ways that transitions, expectations and markers around age and life-course stages are modified in interplay with social change. This new concept is necessary, we argue, because age-inscriptions correspond to more indeterminate and transitional levels of changes in aging trajectories and life stages than the concept of norms. Inscriptions lie between rules, laws, and norms on the one hand, and individual feelings, emotions, and actions on the other. They are at least slightly shared between individuals, and, thus, somewhat more standardized than individual behavior, but not as standardized and shared as norms. This introduction lays out the reasons why ageinscriptions happen, as well as the primary ways by which they are formed and generated. We conclude by arguing that contemporary age-inscriptions are fashioned in relation to a longer life course encountered by a new generation, an increasing temporalization and institutionalization of the life course, and high levels of mobility and migration. 

Author Biographies

Cati Coe, Rutgers University

Professor of Anthropology at Rutgers University

Erdmute Alber, Bayreuth University

Chair of Social Anthropology, Bayreuth University

References

Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1991. “Writing against Culture.” In Recapturing Anthropology Working in the Present, edited by Richard G. Fox, 137-154. Santa Fe: School of American Research.

Ahearn, Laura. 2001. Invitations to Love: Literacy, Love Letters, and Social Change in Nepal. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

Astuti, Rita. 2000. “Kindreds and Descent Groups. New Perspectives from Madagascar.” In Cultures of Relatedness. New Approaches to the Study of Kinship, edited by Janet Carsten, 9-104. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bernardi, Bernardo. 1985. Age Class Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Bloch, Maurice. 1998. “The Uses of Schooling and Literacy in a Zafimaniry Village.” In How We Think They Think: Anthropological Approaches to Cognition, Memory, and Literacy, by Maurice Bloch, 171-192. Boulder: Westview Press.

Borneman, John. 1992. Belonging in the Two Berlins: Kin, State, Nation. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Translated by Richard Nice. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bourdieu, Pierre and Jean-Claude Passeron. 1990. Reproduction in Education, Society, and Culture. Translated by Richard Nice. Second ed. Newbury Park: Sage Publications.

Brubaker, Thomas H. 1986. “Developmental Tasks in Later Life: An Overview.” American Behavioral Scientist 29(4): 381-388.

Case, Anne and Alicia Mendendez. 2007. “Does Money empower the Elderly? Evidence from the Agincourt Demographic Surveillance Site, South Africa.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 35: 157–164.

Cohen, Lawrence. 1998. No Aging in India: Alzheimer’s, The Bad Family, and Other Modern Things. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Cole, Jennifer. 2013. On Generations and Aging: “Fresh Contact” of a Different Sort. In Transitions and Transformations: Cultural Perspectives on Aging and the Life Course, edited by Caitrin Lynch and Jason Danely, 218-230. New York: Berghahn.

Cole, Jennifer and Deborah Durham. 2007. “Introduction: Age, Regeneration and the Intimate Politics of Globalization.” In Generations and Globalization: Youth, Age, and Family in the New World Economy, edited by Cole and Durham, 1-28. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Comaroff, Jean and John L. Comaroff. 1991. Of Revelation and Revolution: Christianity, Colonialism and Consciousness in South Africa. Vol. 1. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Feldman-Savelsberg, Pamela. 2016. Mothers on the Move: Reproducing Belonging between Africa and Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Finch, Janet and Jennifer Mason. 2000. Passing On: Kinship and Inheritance in England. London: Routledge.

Foucault, Michel. 1980. The History of Sexuality. New York: Vintage.

Goffman, Erving. 1986. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

Goody, Jack. 1962. Death, Property, and the Ancestors: A Study of the Mortuary Customs of the LoDagaa of West Africa. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

Graw, Knut and Samuli Schielke, eds. 2012. The Global Horizon: Expectations of Migration in Africa and the Middle East. Leuven: Leuven University Press.

Hagestad, Gunhild O. 1986. “The Aging Society as a Context of Family Life.” Daedalus 115 (1): 119-139.

Hagestad, Gunhild O. and Linda Burton. 1986. “Grandparenthood, Life Context, and Family Development.” American Behavioral Scientist 29 (4): 471-484.

Hareven, Tamara. 1982. Family Time and Industrial Time: The Relationship between the Family and Work in a New England Industrial Community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Howell, Signe. 2006. The Kinning of Foreigners: Transnational Adoption in a Global Perspective. New York: Berghahn Books.

Kohli, Martin. 2009. “Die Institutionalisierung des Lebenslaufs. Historische Befunde und theoretische Argumente.“ In Soziale Ungleichheit. Klassische Texte zur Sozialstrukturanalyse, edited by Heike Solga, Justin Powell und Peter A. Berger, 387-400. Frankfurt, New York: Campus.

Lamb, Sarah. 2009. Aging and the Indian Diaspora: Cosmopolitan Families in India and Abroad. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

Lamb, Sarah. 2000. White Saris and Sweet Mangos: Aging, Gender, and the Body in North India. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Laslett, Peter. 1980. “The History of Aging and the Aged.” In Family Life and Illicit Love in Earlier Generations, by Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Leinaweaver, Jessaca B. 2010. “Outsourcing Care: How Peruvian Migrants Meet Transnational Family Obligations.” Latin American Perspectives 37: 67-87.

MacLeod, Jay. 1995. Ain’t No Makin’ It: Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income Neighborhood. Boulder: Westview Press.

Mannheim, Karl. 1964 [1928]. “Das Problem der Generationen.“ In Wissenssoziologie. Auswahl aus dem Werk, edited by Kurt H. Wolff, 509-565.. Berlin: Luchterhand Verlag.

Mauss, Marcel. 2006. “Techniques of the Body (1935).” In Techniques, Technology, and Civilisation, edited by Nathan Schlanger, 77-96. New York: Durkheim Press/Berghahn Books.

Medick, Hans and David Sabean, eds. 1984. Interest and Emotion: Essays on the Study of Family and Kinship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Myerhoff, Barbara. 1984. “Rites and Signs of Ripening: The Intertwining of Ritual, Time, and Growing Older. In Age & Anthropological Theory, edited by David I. Kertzer and Jennie Keith, 305-330. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

Nora, Pierre. 2001. Rethinking France: Les Lieux de Mémoire. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Ortner, Sherry B. 2006. Anthropology and Social Theory: Culture, Power, and the Acting Subject. Durham: Duke University Press.

Riley, Matilda White and John W. Riley, Jr. 1986. “Longevity and Social Structure: The Added Years.” Daedalus 115 (1): 51-75.

Rosow, Irving. 1974. Socialization to Old Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.

Scott, James C. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Segalen, Martine. 2016. “On Papies and Mammies: The Invention of a New Parent in Contemporary European Kinship.” Paper delivered at the Max Planck Institute, Halle, May 27.

Sewell, William H. 2005. Logics of History: Social Theory and Social Transformation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Stack, Carol and Linda M. Burton. 1993. “Kinscripts.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies 24(2): 157-170.

Swidler, Ann. 2001. Talk of Love: How Culture Matters. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Thelen, Tatjana. 2015. “Care as Social Organization: Creating, Maintaining and Dissolving Significant Relations.” Anthropological Theory 15(4): 497-515.

Thelen, Tatjana. 2005. “Caring Grandfathers: Changes in Support between Generations in East Germany.” In Generations, Kinship, and Care: Gendered Provisions of Social Security in Central Eastern Europe, edited by Haldis Haukanes and Frances Pine, 163-188. Bergen: University of Bergen.

Ungruhe, Christian. 2014. “Migration, Marriage and Modernity: Motives, Impacts and Negotiations of Rural-Urban Circulation amongst Young Women in Northern Ghana.” In Spaces in Movement. New Perspectives on Migration in African Settings, edited by Mustafa Abdalla, Denise Dias Barros and Marina Berthet, 105-125. Köln: Rüdiger Köppe.

United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. 2013. World Population Ageing 2013. ST/ESA/SER.A/348. Accessed 24 July 2016. http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/publications/pdf/ageing/WorldPopulationAgeing2013.pdf.

Williams, Raymond. 1982. The Sociology of Culture. New York: Schocken Books.

AAA 2011

AAA and BBB 2015.

AAA and CCC. 2010.

AAA, CCC, and DDD. 2010.

AAA, EEE, and FFF. 2004.

CCC 2016.

GGG 2007.

HHH. 2011.

III. 2017.

XXX and YYY. 2017.

YYY Forthcoming.

YYY 2013a.

YYY 2013b.

YYY 2012.

Downloads

Published

2018-09-24

Issue

Vol. 39 No. 1 (2018)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.