Societal Participation of the Elderly: Information and Communication Technologies as a “Social Junction”

Authors

  • Peter Biniok Furtwangen University
  • Iris Menke

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5195/aa.2015.102

Keywords:

aging, social inclusion, assistive technologies

Abstract

The technoscape is described as the global configuration of technology as well as its intermingling and intertwining with other spheres of society. In fact, society and technology are hard to separate. Technology and the overall technoscape influence lifestyles and living conditions; conversely, developing, implementing and utilizing technologies all shape the technoscape. Starting from this interdependence, we examine how sociotechnical configurations determine social participation among the elderly in rural regions. To investigate the extent to which social participation of the elderly may be enhanced, a tablet PC with a self-developed communication platform was submitted to a field test. The results of our qualitative analysis show three ideal-type developments: the emergence of a new participation space, the extension of established participation space and engagement in the existing participation space. Technology as a “social junction” can thus have positive impacts on the social participation of the elderly.

Author Biography

Peter Biniok, Furtwangen University

Faculty of Health, Safety, Society

References

Askonas, Peter and Angus Stewart, eds. 2000. Social inclusion. Possibilities and tensions. New York, N.Y.: St. Martin's Press.

Baumgartner, Katrin, Franz Kolland, and Anna Wanka. 2013. Altern im ländlichen Raum. Entwicklungsmöglichkeiten und Teilhabepotentiale. Kohlhammer.

Becks, Thomas, Johannes Dehm, and Eberhardt, Birgid. 2007. Ambient Assisted Living. Neue „intelligente“ Assistenzsysteme für Prävention, Homecare und Pflege. Frankfurt am Main: DGBMT im VDE.

Bijker, Wiebe E. and Jonh Law, eds. 1992. Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in sociotechnical change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.

Biniok, Peter, Iris Menke and Stefan Selke. fc. “Social Inclusion of Elderly People in Rural Areas by Social and Technological Mechanisms.” In Ageing and Technology: Perspectives from the Social Sciences, edited by Emma Domínguez-Rué and Linda Nierling. Bielefeld: transcript.

Biniok, Peter and Stefan Selke. 2014. “Öffentliche Forschung zu sozialer Teilhabe älterer Menschen auf dem Land.” In Forschungsbericht 2014/2015, 42-44. Furtwangen: Hochschule Furtwangen.

Bohl, Karl Friedrich. 2005. “Sozialstruktur.” In Handwörterbuch zur ländlichen Gesellschaft in Deutschland, edited by Stephan Beetz, Kai Brauer, and Claudia Neu, 225-233. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.

Bourdieu, Pierre. 1987. Sozialer Sinn. Kritik der theoretischen Vernunft. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Dangschat, Jens, Wolfram Droth, Jürgen Friedrichs, and Klaus Kiehl. 1982. Aktionsräume von Stadtbewohnern. Eine empirische Untersuchung in der Region Hamburg. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.

Dorer, Bernhard. 2012. Wälderleben. Geschichte und Geschichten der Landwirtschaft im Hochschwarzwald im Wandel der Zeit. Freiburg im Breisgau: Badischer Landwirtschafts-Verlag.

Downey, John and Jim McGuigan. 1999. Technocities. London, Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage.

Dracklé, Dorle, ed. 1998. Alt und zahm? Alter und Älterwerden in unterschiedlichen Kulturen. Berlin, Hamburg: Reimer.

Esposito, Elena. 1993. “Der Computer als Medium und Maschine.” ZfS 22(5): 338-354.

Georgieff, Peter. 2009. Aktives Alter(n) und Technik. Nutzung der Informations- und Kommunikationstechnik (IKT) zur Erhaltung und Betreuung der Gesundheit älterer Menschen zu Hause. Karlsruhe: Fraunhofer-Institut für System- und Innovationsforschung.

Gieryn, Thomas F. 2000. “A Space for Place in Sociology.” Annu. Rev. Sociol. 26: 463–496.

Green, Judith and Nicki Thorogood. 2014. Qualitative methods for health research. London: Sage.

Glaser, Barney G. and Anselm L. Strauss. 2009. Status passage. New Brunswick N.J.: Aldine Transaction.

Granovetter, Mark S. 1973. “The Strength of Weak Ties.” AJS 78 (6): 1360–1380.

Harper, Douglas A. 1987. Working knowledge. Skill and community in a small shop. Chicago, Ill.: University of Chicago Press.

Hopf, Christel. 2005. “Qualitative Interviews – ein Überblick.” In Qualitative Forschung. Ein Handbuch, edited by Uwe Flick, Ernst von Kardorff and Ines Steinke, 349-360. Reinbek bei Hamburg: Rowohlt.

Kessl, Fabian, Christian Reutlinger, Susanne Maurer, and Oliver Frey. eds. 2005. Handbuch Sozialraum. Wiesbaden: VS.

Köbler, Felix, Martin Hoekrich, Philip Koene, Philipp Menschner, Andreas Prinz, Jan Marco Leimeister, and Helmut Krcmar. 2011. “Benutzerfreundlichkeit von mobilen Applikationen zur Nutzung von virtuellen Netzgemeinschaften für die Generation 50+.” In Mit AAL-Dienstleistungen altern. Nutzerbedarfsanalysen im Kontext des Ambient Assisted Living, edited by Daniel Bieber and Kathleen Schwarz, 97-114. Saarbrücken: iso.

Köster, Dietmar, Renate Schramek and Silke Dorn. 2008. Qualitätsziele moderner SeniorInnenarbeit und Altersbildung. Oberhausen: Athena.

Kuckartz, Udo. 2010. Einführung in die computergestützte Analyse qualitativer Daten. Wiesbaden. VS Verlag.

Lancioni, Giulio E. and Nirbhay N. Singh. eds. 2014. Assistive Technologies for People with Diverse Abilities. Berlin: Springer.

Läpple, Dieter. 1991. “Essay über den Raum: für ein gesellschaftswissenschaftliches Raumkonzept.” In Stadt und Raum, edited by Hartmut, Häussermann, Detlef Ipsen, and Thomas Krämer-Badoni, 157-207. Pfaffenweiler: Centaurus-Verlag.

Läpple, Dieter. 1992. “Thesen zu einem Konzept gesellschaftlicher Räume.” In Die aufgeräumte Welt. Raumbilder und Raumkonzepte im Zeitalter globaler Marktwirtschaft, edited by Jörg Mayer, 29-52. Rehburg-Loccum: Evangelische Akademie Loccum.

Latour, Bruno. 1998. “Über technische Vermittlung. Philosophie, Soziologie, Genealogie.” In Technik und Sozialtheorie, edited by Werner Rammert, 29-81. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

LEADER Aktionsgruppe Südschwarzwald. 2009. Zum Kuckuck! Der Schwarzwald wird alt. St. Blasien.

Lévi-Strauss. 1968. Das wilde Denken. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Löw, Martina. 2001. Raumsoziologie. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

MacKenzie, Donald A. and Judy Wajcman. eds. 1999. The social shaping of technology. Buckingham: Open University Press.

Merton, Robert King. 1996. On social structure and science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Merz, Martina and Sormani, Philippe. eds. fc. The Local Configuration of New Research Fields: On Regional and National Diversity. Dordrecht, Heidelberg, London, New York: Springer.

Nye, David E. 2007. Technology matters. Questions to live with. Cambridge/Massachusetts, London: MIT Press.

Oudshoorn, Nelly and Trevor Pinch. 2003. How Users Matter. The Co-Construction of Users and Technology. Cambridge/Massachusetts, London: MIT Press.

Putnam, Robert D. 1995. “Bowling Alone: America’s Declining Social Capital.” Journal of Democracy 6 (1): 65-78.

Rammert, Werner. 2007. Technik – Handeln – Wissen. Zu einer pragmatischen Technik- und Sozialtheorie. Wiesbaden: VS.

Rammert, Werner and Cornelius Schubert. eds. 2006. Technografie. Zur Mikrosoziologie der Technik. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Raitelhuber, Eberhard. 2011. Übergänge und Agency. Eine sozialtheoretische Reflexion des Lebenslaufkonzepts. Opladen, Berlin. Budrich Uni Press.

Riege, Marlo and Herbert Schubert. eds. 2005. Sozialraumanalyse. Grundlagen - Methoden - Praxis. Wiesbaden: VS.

Sassen, Saskia. 2001. The global city. New York, London, Tokyo. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.

Saxenian, AnnaLee. 2000. “The Origins and Dynamics of Production Networks in Silicon Valley.” In Entrepreneurship. The Social Science View, edited by Richard Swedberg, 308-331. NY: Oxford University Press.

Scherger, Simone, Kai Brauer, and Harald Künemund. 2004. “Partizipation und Engagement älterer Menschen – Elemente der Lebensführung im Stadt-Land-Vergleich” In Lebensformen und Lebensführung im Alter, edited by Gertrud Backes, Wolfgang Clemens and Harald Künemund, 173-192. Berlin: Springer.

Schmidt, Christiane. 1997. “«Am Material»: Auswertungstechniken für Leitfadeninterviews.” In Handbuch Qualitative Forschungsmethoden in der Erziehungswissenschaft, edited by Barbara Friebertshäuser and Annedore Prengel, 544-568. Weinheim, München: Juventus.

Schroer, Markus. 2006. Räume, Orte, Grenzen. Auf dem Weg zu einer Soziologie des Raums. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.

Schütte, Joannes D. 2012. “Soziale Inklusion und Exklusion: Norm, Zustandsbeschreibung und Handlungsoptionen.” In Handbuch Armut und soziale Ausgrenzung, edited by Ernst-Ulrich Huster, Jürgen Boeckh and Hildegard Mogge-Grotjahn, 104-121. Berlin: Springer.

Schütze, Fritz (1983): “Biographieforschung und narratives Interview.” Neue Praxis 13 (3): 283-293.

Urry, John. 2007. Mobilities. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Strauss, Anselm; Corbin, Juliet. 1990. “Grounded Theory Research: Procedures, Canons and Evaluative Criteria.” Zeitschrift für Soziologie 19 (6): 418-427.

Walter, Ulla and Thomas Altgeld. 2002. “Alter(n) im ländlichen Raum – Resümee und Ansätze für eine vorausschauende Gesundheits- und Altenpolitik.” In Altern im ländlichen Raum: Ansätze für eine vorausschauende Alten- und Gesundheitspolitik, edited by Ulla Walter and Thomas Altgeld, 318-327. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.

Wansing, Gudrun. 2005. Teilhabe an der Gesellschaft – Menschen mit Behinderung zwischen Inklusion und Exklusion, Wiesbaden: VS.

Warschauer, Mark. 2003. Technology and social inclusion. Rethinking the digital divide. Cambridge/Massachusetts: MIT Press.

Downloads

Published

2015-11-19

Issue

Vol. 36 No. 2 (2015)

Section

Articles

License

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. The Author retains copyright in the Work, where the term “Work” shall include all digital objects that may result in subsequent electronic publication or distribution.
  2. Upon acceptance of the Work, the author shall grant to the Publisher the right of first publication of the Work.
  3. The Author shall grant to the Publisher and its agents the nonexclusive perpetual right and license to publish, archive, and make accessible the Work in whole or in part in all forms of media now or hereafter known under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License or its equivalent, which, for the avoidance of doubt, allows others to copy, distribute, and transmit the Work under the following conditions:
    1. Attribution—other users must attribute the Work in the manner specified by the author as indicated on the journal Web site;
    with the understanding that the above condition can be waived with permission from the Author and that where the Work or any of its elements is in the public domain under applicable law, that status is in no way affected by the license.
  4. The Author is able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the nonexclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the Work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), as long as there is provided in the document an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post online a prepublication manuscript (but not the Publisher’s final formatted PDF version of the Work) in institutional repositories or on their Websites prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work. Any such posting made before acceptance and publication of the Work shall be updated upon publication to include a reference to the Publisher-assigned DOI (Digital Object Identifier) and a link to the online abstract for the final published Work in the Journal.
  6. Upon Publisher’s request, the Author agrees to furnish promptly to Publisher, at the Author’s own expense, written evidence of the permissions, licenses, and consents for use of third-party material included within the Work, except as determined by Publisher to be covered by the principles of Fair Use.
  7. The Author represents and warrants that:
    1. the Work is the Author’s original work;
    2. the Author has not transferred, and will not transfer, exclusive rights in the Work to any third party;
    3. the Work is not pending review or under consideration by another publisher;
    4. the Work has not previously been published;
    5. the Work contains no misrepresentation or infringement of the Work or property of other authors or third parties; and
    6. the Work contains no libel, invasion of privacy, or other unlawful matter.
  8. The Author agrees to indemnify and hold Publisher harmless from Author’s breach of the representations and warranties contained in Paragraph 6 above, as well as any claim or proceeding relating to Publisher’s use and publication of any content contained in the Work, including third-party content.

Revised 7/16/2018. Revision Description: Removed outdated link.